The impact of intensified staging and combined therapies in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a secondary analysis of prospective studies.

AIM: To investigate the use of comprehensive pre-treatment staging with multiple diagnostic modalities, including functional imaging and minimally invasive surgical procedures, in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. The primary objective was to detect occult metastatic disease using staging laparoscopy and 18FFDG-PET/CT scan. The study also evaluated treatment efficacy and outcomes in LAPC patients treated with combined therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of three prospective studies of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with or without induction chemotherapy (IC). The inclusion period was from December 2009 until February 2023. An intensified pretreatment staging was conducted for all LAPC patients. Patients without distant disease at initial staging, with borderline resectable or unresectable LAPC, were enrolled in chemoradiotherapy combination protocols (CRT with or without IC). IC regimens included GemOx or FOLFIRINOX for four cycles, followed by concurrent CRT with gemcitabine. The primary endpoint was the detection of occult metastatic disease, and secondary objectives included resection rate, treatment toxicity, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). RESULTS: Out of the 134 LAPC patients, 33.5% were identified with metastatic disease. Of these, 23.1% had a positive exploratory laparoscopy. Additionally, 13.4% were identified as having distant metastases by 18-FDG PET/CT. The median PFS for all patients who completed CRT was 14.3 months, and the median OS was 17.2 months. Resected patients after the combined therapies demonstrated significantly improved outcomes compared to non-resected patients (median PFS, 22.5 mo vs. 9.5 mo, P<0.001; median OS, 38.2 mo vs. 13 mo, P<0.001). Moreover, patients treated with IC followed by CRT showed significantly better outcomes compared to upfront CRT group (median PFS, 19 mo vs. 9.9 mo, P<0.001; median OS, 19.3 mo vs. 14.6 mo, P<0.001). At univariate logistic regression analysis, the adding of IC was the only predictor for resection rate (95% CI 0.12-1.02, P=0.05), and this data was confirmed at multivariate analysis (95% CI 0.09-0.98, P=0.04). Haematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed during treatment, with manageable adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The use of comprehensive pre-treatment staging, including laparoscopy and 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan, is an effective approach in identifying occult metastatic disease in LAPC patients. Our findings offer valuable insights into accurate staging and treatment efficacy, providing evidence-based support for optimal management strategies in LAPC patients.

Advances in pre-treatment evaluation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Despite advances in the multidisciplinary management of pancreatic cancer, overall prognosis remains poor, due to early progression of the disease. There is a need to also take action in staging, to make it increasingly accurate and complete, to define the setting of the therapeutic strategy. This review was planned to update the current status of pre-treatment evaluation for pancreatic cancer. Methods: We conducted an extensive review, including relevant articles dealing with traditional imaging, functional imaging and minimally invasive surgical procedures before treatment for pancreatic cancer. We searched articles written in English only. Data in the PubMed database, published in the period between January 2000 and January 2022, were retrieved. Prospective observational studies, retrospective analyses and meta-analyses were reviewed and analysed. Key Content and Findings: Each imaging modality (endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, computed tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, staging laparoscopy) has its own diagnostic advantages and limitations. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for each image set are reported. Data that support the increasing role of neoadjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) and the meaning of a patient-tailored treatment selection, based on tumour staging, are also discussed. Conclusions: A multimodal pre-treatment workup should be searched as it improves staging accuracy, orienting patients with resectable tumors towards surgery, optimizing patient selection with locally advanced tumors to neoadjuvant or definite therapy and avoiding surgical resection or curative radiotherapy in those with metastatic disease.

Are you planning to be a radiation oncologist? A survey by the young group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (yAIRO).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Young Section of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (yAIRO) circulated an online questionnaire survey among residents currently enrolled within Italian radiotherapy residency schools to investigate the profiles, motivations, knowledge of the radiotherapy discipline, organizations and the needs of younger members. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey was developed by the yAIRO steering committee and included questions about the demographic characteristics of the residents (Profile A), the background of their clinical experience during the school of medicine and national residency admission test performance (Profile B) and the residents' knowledge of the scientific associations active in the field of radiotherapy (Profile C). RESULTS: Out of 400 residents actually in training, 134 responded to the questionnaire (response rate 33.5%). According to most of the residents, radiotherapy was not adequately studied during the medical school (n. 95; 71%) and an Internship in Radiotherapy was not mandatory (n. 99; 74%). Only a minority of the residents had chosen to complete a master's degree thesis in radiotherapy (n. 12; 9%). A low percentage of the residents stated that they were aware of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO), its young section (yAIRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) when they were in School of Medicine (respectively, 11%, 7% and 13%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey require a profound reflection on the current teaching methods of Radiation Oncology in our country, highlighting the need for a better integration in the framework of the School of Medicine core curriculum.

Concurrent radiotherapy with palbociclib or ribociclib for metastatic breast cancer patients: Preliminary assessment of toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early toxicity of concurrent use of radiotherapy in association with CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib or ribociclib) in patients with hormone-receptors positive metastatic breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Records of patients with histologically proven metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer treated in our institution were reviewed. Patients who received radiotherapy and concurrent palbociclib or ribociclib were selected. Toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE V4.0). RESULTS: Sixteen consecutive metastatic breast cancer patients with 24 radiotherapy treatments were studied. Thirteen patients (81.3%) received palbociclib, 3 (18.7%) patients received ribociclib concurrently with RT (18 and 5 radiotherapy courses respectively). The majority of patients (68.7%) received palliative radiotherapy to the bones (median dose 30 Gy, range 8-36 Gy). Five patients (31.2%) were treated in oligo-metastatic or oligo-progressive sites of disease with higher doses (median dose = 50 Gy, range 39.6-60 Gy). The most common toxicity observed was hematological toxicity. Neutropenia was common (grade 2 = 12.5%; grade 3 = 25%, grade 4 = 6.3%); 60% of patients experiencing grade ≥ 3 neutropenia had already experienced neutropenia during previous cycles of palbociclib. One patient (6.3%) completed the RT course earlier (48 Gy of 50 Gy prescribed) and another patient (6.3%) suspended RT for 2 days. CONCLUSION: concomitant treatment of CDK4/6 and radiotherapy seems well tolerated; high grade hematological toxicity is common, but did not change treatment course in the majority of patients. Previous toxicity should be carefully evaluated as it usually reoccurs.